A bill was advanced on Tuesday by California legislators hoping to give regulators the authority to reject excessive rate increases proposed in health insurance policies. While disagreements ensued between legislators, mostly along party lines, the bill eventually received the 12 votes needed to move it out of the assembly health committee.
Regulators Want the Right to Reject Rate Increases
Health insurance companies have been known for attempting to impose high rate hikes on their customers. This has occurred most recently with Blue Shield of California, which threatened to increase rates by as much as 59 percent.
While regulators were not happy with the increase Blue Shield and other companies have proposed, the most they could do was ask the companies to hold off on rate hikes until Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones had an opportunity to review them and ensure they were not spending less than 70 percent of their premiums on health care expenses.
If they followed this guideline, companies could increase rates as high and often as they like.
Regulators want more power in governing this area, which is why Democratic Assemblyman Mike Feuer of Los Angeles introduced his bill to the Assembly Health Committee. If it passes in Congress, California would join 35 other states that currently have the right to reject rate hikes.
Calif. Insurance Customers Pay Near Highest Rates in the Nation
Commissioner Jones said at the committee hearing on Tuesday that California policyholders pay some of the highest insurance rates in the country. Since regulators hands are tied when it comes to controlling the rates, companies can continue to impose hikes without explanation.
He noted those who suffer the most are people holding individual health insurance policies since they have faced the biggest rate hikes in recent years. Even worse, Feuer and several fellow Democrats say that the hikes are not being used to pay for an increase in health costs, but are instead adding to the companies profits.
Charles Bacchi, the California Association of Health Plans Executive Vice President, opposed the bill on behalf of health insurance companies, stating that medical costs would require a $40 million bureaucracy to execute its intentions. However, Jones said the top five insurers alone in California collectively received more than $11 billion in profits last year and therefore must be more closely governed.
Similar Posts:
- Health Insurers Agree to 60-Day Rate Hike Delay
- Blue Shield of California Cancels Premium Rate Hike
- Health Insurers to Face Scrutiny If Premiums Are Raised In 2011
- Compare Temporary Health Insurance Rates
- Today’s News: Insurance Available for Early Retirees, Chinese Drywall Goes to Trial and Car-Sharing Insurance Bill Passes
Post comment
Popular Posts
- Reasonably Priced Sky-scraping Lottery Coupé Cover
- Farmers Automobile Insurance Business Digest
- Cheap small business insurance helps a start-up survive
- Bank holiday breaks: don’t forget your travel essentials!
- Cheap car insurance tips – how much coverage to buy?
- Women’s Guide For Auto Insurance
- Low Cost Car Insurance
- Contemplating Aiming For the Best Value in Insurance plans
- Finding auto insurance when you rent a vehicle
- Landlord insurance ‘essential’ for buy-to-let homeowners
Categories
Similar Posts
- Health Insurers Agree to 60-Day Rate Hike Delay
- Blue Shield of California Cancels Premium Rate Hike
- Health Insurers to Face Scrutiny If Premiums Are Raised In 2011
- Compare Temporary Health Insurance Rates
- Today’s News: Insurance Available for Early Retirees, Chinese Drywall Goes to Trial and Car-Sharing Insurance Bill Passes
- California Auto Insurance DUI
Blogroll
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010